The Adaptation Capability Advancement Toolkit (Adapt-CA) is intended to assist California local governments with overcoming common institutional barriers and improving agency capabilities. By using Adapt-CA, local governments will be able to rapidly identify opportunities to improve existing capabilities in order to pursue climate change adaptation initiatives more effectively and holistically.
Each component of Adapt-CA is organized by four process areas, which are defined asthe core areas of control within local governments and where institutional barriers to pursuing adaptation commonly arise.
Each process area is also organized along four maturity levels, which are milestones that follow an evolutionary path toward more advanced, institutionalized, and continuously improving capabilities.
The Matrix describes the high-level core adaptation capabilities of a local government for each process area at each maturity level. New users are recommended to review the Matrix to gain familiarity with the Adapt-CA structure.
The Checklists describe core adaptation capabilities in greater detail, as well as the associated benefits of advancing capabilities. The Checklists allow for rapid self-assessments of existing agency capabilities to help users navigate the Roadmap.
The Roadmap provides suggested actions, additional guidance, and recommended resources to advance adaptation capabilities. By using the Roadmap, local government staff can pinpoint concrete next steps that will enable their agency to pursue adaptation initiatives more effectively and holistically.
Adapt-CA is a product of the Overcoming Institutional Barriers to Implementing Local Adaptation Strategies project under California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment. The toolkit has been developed by the Local Government Commission, ICF International, and Susanne Moser Research & Consulting in partnership with ARCCA.
As such, Adapt-CA has been developed to assist local governments to overcome these barriers by identifying actions that can be taken to advance agency capabilities. Adapt-CA is intended to be used by local government staff who are involved in day-to-day management and operations, as well as by agency executives. The toolkit allows for both a top-down approach among decision-makers and a bottom-up approach for project managers and planners. Due to the inherent nature and scale of climate change impacts, it is recommended that key departments and offices, including community development, economic development, emergency services, sustainability and public works, collaborate to fully leverage this toolkit. The development of Adapt-CA has been informed by Capability Maturity Models, which originate from the software development industry to describe current processes and strategies to overcome barriers to improve processes and produce desired outcomes.
This toolkit provides guidance on improving agency capabilities without specific connections to regulations or funding opportunities. While it can be used to identify areas that require further attention and investments, as well as to build the case for making such investments, the sole use of this toolkit is not expected to provide additional funding for adaptation and resiliency efforts. Although Adapt-CA is designed with the understanding that each agency encounters unique challenges and opportunities in order to enable local governments of all sizes and types to utilize the toolkit, reaching the highest maturity level defined in this toolkit may not be desirable or suitable for all California local governments.
The Matrix describes the high-level core adaptation capabilities of a local government for each process area at each maturity level. New users are recommended to review the Matrix to gain familiarity with the Adapt-CA structure and to gain an understanding of what each process area includes. The Matrix serves as the backbone of the toolkit and follows the structure of Capability Maturity Models, which were pioneered by the software development industry.
Leadership & Organizational Culture
|Limited integration of climate risks and adaptation into agency goals, plans, and activities, driven by individual champion(s), with minimal support from executive leadership.||High-level integration of climate risks and adaptation into several agency goals, plans, and activities, and occasional intra-agency coordination with some executive leadership engagement.||Strong integration of climate risks and adaptation into agency goals, plans, and activities, regular intra-agency coordination, and widespread recognition across leadership and staff of the importance of adaptation.||Climate risks and adaptation are central to overall agency goals as core guidance for decision-making, planning, and investment.|
|Limited allocation of time and resources, on a project-by-project basis, to increase broad technical skills, with no specific staff responsible for adaptation.||Access to broad technical skills including an identified internal adaptation point-person responsible for adaptation and a few champions in other departments.||Consistent and reliable access to specific technical skills, with adaptation point-persons in multiple key agency departments.||Agency-wide competency on climate change risks and adaptation, with dedicated adaptation staff appropriate to agency size.|
|Ad-hoc or opportunistic external communications about climate risks and adaptation, and limited collaboration with external stakeholders on a project-to-project basis.||Consistent integration of climate risks and adaptation into external engagements beyond just projects. Community input factored into adaptation considerations, and some mapping of external skills and resources conducted.||Regular, timely, and effective engagement with relevant community audiences aligned with an engagement plan. A strong network of external collaborators is regularly accessed and utilized for adaptation efforts.||Community engagement and stakeholder input are formalized and effective throughout local government operations, so as to ensure adaptation activities reflect community needs and are efficient in use of external resources to implement adaptation efforts.|
|Ad-hoc adaptation activities occurring on a project-by-project basis with varying levels of comprehensiveness and ad-hoc internal funding for adaptation.||High-level integration of climate risks and adaptation into several projects, activities, and agency processes with basic understanding of the business case for undertaking adaptation in projects.||Strong integration of climate risks and adaptation into standard agency processes, with some dedicated funding for adaptation and some efforts to monitor performance.||Fully institutionalized integration of climate risks and adaptation into agency decision making and planning processes and financial considerations with tracking of project and program outcomes against an agency-wide measure of adaptive capacity.|
The Checklists describe core adaptation capabilities in greater detail, as well as the associated benefits of advancing capabilities. By using the Checklists, local government staff can conduct rapid self-assessments of existing agency capabilities in order to navigate the Roadmap. These can also serve as resources to demonstrate to other staff and decision-makers the importance of developing adaptation capabilities.
The Roadmap is the culmination of the research project and the most robust and detailed component of the toolkit. The Roadmap provides suggested actions, additional guidance, and recommended resources to help local agencies advance their adaptation capabilities. By using the Roadmap, local government staff can pinpoint concrete next steps that will enable their agency to pursue adaptation initiatives more effectively and holistically.
Navigating the Roadmap
We are working diligently to keep the Roadmap as up-to-date as possible, which can be challenging due to the rapid evolution of the adaptation field in California. If you have any recommendations for additional resources to include or to improve the suggested actions or guidance provided, please contact us.